There is a fact in your question that changes the analysis and nobody has picked up on it: you had a contractor come out, and he told you in writing or in person that the insulation is dated and needs replacing. That opinion now exists in the world, and it exists with your name attached to it. Kevin stated Florida's standard precisely above, known facts that materially affect value and are not readily observable, and Julie went right at the contractor scenario, and Michelle is right that the form gives you a "don't know" option. So I will not re-litigate the legal test. Here is the practical layer on top of it. Once a professional has inspected and given you an opinion, "I did not know" is no longer available to you. You do know. That does not automatically make it a required disclosure, because a dated component is not the same thing as a defect, and you have described no mold, no condensation, and no damage. But it moves you from the safe zone of ignorance into the zone where the honest answer to "did you know" is yes. And there is a second practical reality. The buyer's home inspector is going to go into that attic. Insulation depth and condition is a standard inspection item, and a general inspector will note dated or insufficient insulation as a matter of routine. So the odds that this stays hidden are low. Which reframes the question usefully: you are not choosing between disclosing and not disclosing. You are choosing between disclosing it yourself and having it discovered. Those two paths end very differently. A seller who wrote it down looks careful. A seller whose inspection report reveals something the disclosure form did not mention looks like someone who was hoping. That perception costs real money at the repair negotiation, and it invites the buyer to go looking for what else you left off. So my answer is: disclose it, and disclose it in the least alarming accurate way possible. Something like, a contractor evaluated the attic insulation and advised that it is dated and would benefit from replacement. No known mold, condensation, or damage. Temperature varies between floors. Notice what that does. It states the fact rather than characterizing the property. It includes the contractor's opinion, so nobody can say you withheld it. And it includes the absence of the consequences the buyer would actually worry about. One thing that helps more than words: give them your utility bills. Twelve months of actual bills is a fact, not a characterization, and if your costs are unremarkable it quietly resolves the entire concern. Buyers worry about a temperature difference because they think it signals an expensive problem. Bills answer that better than any paragraph you could write. And if you want to remove the issue entirely, price out the insulation upgrade. Attic insulation is one of the lower-cost, higher-return items in a house. Depending on the number, doing it before you list may cost you less than the credit a buyer will ask for after their inspector writes it up, and you get to market it as a recent improvement instead of explaining it as a deficiency. I am Zoltan Peresztegi, a real estate professional in Los Angeles and the South Bay, and I am not an attorney. Whether this specific item legally requires disclosure in Florida is a question for a Florida real estate attorney or your listing agent, who can look at your actual form. I do not work Florida, but I am glad to connect you with a strong local agent through my network. Here is the rule I would give any seller: the thing that causes lawsuits is almost never the condition. It is the gap between what the seller knew and what the seller wrote down. Close that gap and you can stop thinking about it. Zoltan


