Hi Brenton, this is a real strategy your agent is proposing, not a brush-off, so let me explain both sides honestly so you can decide with open eyes. Deliberately listing a bit under the comps to spark a bidding war is a legitimate tactic. In an active market with low inventory, a slightly-below-market price can pull in multiple buyers whose competition bids the price up to or above market. Done right, you often net more than if you had listed high and sat. But it only works under specific conditions, and here is where your caution is healthy: - It needs genuine buyer demand. In a slow market, underpricing just means you sold low, with no war to save you. - The gap has to be modest and intentional. Pricing far under invites lowballs, not a frenzy. - Watch the appraisal. If bidding pushes the price well above comps, a financed buyer's appraisal can come in low and the deal has to be renegotiated. Your agent should have a plan for that. How to resolve the disagreement: - Ask your agent to walk you through recent cases where this worked for them, with the list price, the number of offers, and the final sale price. Real examples beat theory. - Ask directly: "What happens if the bidding war does not materialize? What is our repricing plan and timeline?" A confident answer should reassure you; a vague one is a flag. - Remember you set the price. The agent advises; the decision is yours. A good compromise is often to list right at market value, which protects you while still attracting strong interest. If after all that you two still cannot align, that is worth a candid conversation about fit before you sign. I am a real estate professional in Los Angeles and the South Bay, and I am glad to give you an independent read on your comps if you are local, or to connect you with a strong agent in your area for a second opinion. Zoltan


