Yes, and here is the tradeoff nobody in this thread has stated plainly, because it is the whole decision: whatever the inspection finds, you now know. And what you know, you disclose. That is not an argument against doing it. It is the reason to do it deliberately rather than casually. Once a report exists, you cannot unsee it, and going forward you are selling a house with a known list of issues. The upside is that you control the timing, the contractor and the narrative instead of a buyer's inspector handing you the same list on day twelve of escrow with a demand attached. The downside is that you have permanently converted "I did not know" into "I knew." For most sellers of an older home, that trade is worth it, because a buyer's inspector is going to find those things anyway, and finding them during escrow is when they cost the most. Surprises are what kill deals and trigger renegotiations. A known issue with a quote attached is just a number. Now, the part specific to your house. A 1970s home has a handful of things a general inspection may not fully cover, and these are where the money is: Aluminum branch wiring. Single-strand aluminum was substituted for copper in residential wiring from roughly 1965 to 1973 because of copper prices, and about two million homes got it. The Consumer Product Safety Commission found that aluminum-wired homes from that era are dramatically more likely to have connections that reach fire hazard conditions, because aluminum expands and oxidizes differently and the connections loosen over time. This one also has an insurance dimension: some carriers will not write a policy on a house with unremediated single-strand aluminum branch wiring, which means your buyer may not be able to get coverage, which means they may not be able to get a loan. Have the inspector open a few outlets and check. If it is there, the recognized fixes are a full rewire or COPALUM crimp connectors, and knowing that before you list is worth far more than the inspection costs. The sewer lateral. A camera scope of the line from the house to the main is a separate service, it is not part of a general inspection, and on a fifty year old house it is the single most valuable few hundred dollars you can spend. Roots, bellies and collapsed clay lines are five-figure problems that appear at the worst possible moment. Also worth putting on the list: the age and condition of the main electrical panel, whether there is any galvanized supply piping left, the furnace and water heater ages, and the condition of the roof and its flashings. And one legal item. If the house was built before 1978, federal law treats it as target housing for lead-based paint, so at sale you provide the EPA pamphlet, disclose anything you know, hand over any reports, and give the buyer a 10-day window to test unless you both agree otherwise. Most sellers disclose no knowledge, which is usually accurate. Just plan on it. How I would actually use the report. Fix the safety items and anything cheap. For the big items, get two written bids and decide whether to fix, to price for it, or to offer a credit. Then hand the report and the bids to buyers up front. A seller who says "here is the inspection, here are the bids, the price reflects it" negotiates from a much stronger place than one who says "as-is, good luck." I am a real estate professional, not an inspector or an attorney, and I am not licensed in Michigan, so confirm the disclosure specifics with your agent or a Michigan attorney. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles, the South Bay and on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, where most of what I sell is this vintage or older. Get the sewer scoped and the outlets opened. Those two are the ones people skip. Zoltan


