Aaron, worth knowing before you read the rest of this thread: nearly every answer here was written before August 2024, and the rules changed that month. Some of what you are reading describes a system that no longer operates. The short answer to your actual question is no, it is not offensive, and any agent who acts offended has told you something useful about how they will handle negotiation on your behalf. Here is what actually changed, because it reframes your question entirely. As of August 17, 2024, an agent working with a buyer has to sign a written buyer agreement with you before they can take you to see a home. That agreement has to state, specifically and conspicuously, what they will be paid or how the amount gets determined. Not a vague reference, an actual number or formula. So the conversation you are worried about having is now a required conversation. It is on the form. You are not being awkward by raising it, you are doing the thing the paperwork exists to make you do. The second change: offers of compensation can no longer be published on the MLS. That was the mechanism that quietly made one number look like the number. It is gone. Compensation is still negotiable off-MLS, but nothing is preset and nothing is displayed. And the context that makes this make sense: these changes came out of antitrust litigation alleging that industry rules inflated commissions. NAR paid $418 million to settle. The entire point of the outcome was that these fees are negotiable and always were. So the premise of "is it offensive" is backwards. Commissions are not set by law, they never have been, and a court fight was just resolved on exactly that point. Now the practical part, because how you negotiate matters more than whether you do. Ask what you get for the fee before you ask about the fee. Professional photography, floor plan, video, paid placement, print, open house schedule, agent outreach, what happens if it does not sell in thirty days. Get it in writing. Then you are comparing value, not just price, and you will find agents differ enormously. Interview more than one. Three is plenty. You will learn more from the differences between them than from any single conversation. Understand what you are negotiating. Your listing agreement covers what you pay your agent. What, if anything, is offered to a buyer's agent is now a separate decision you make, and it is worth a real conversation rather than a default. Ask your agent to walk you through the tradeoff honestly. And here is the thing to actually watch for. The agent who instantly cuts their fee with no discussion just showed you their negotiating style. That is the person who will be representing you against a buyer's agent on the biggest number in your life. I would rather work with someone who says "here is what I charge and here is exactly what you get for it," and then holds it. That person will hold your price too. Ask directly, ask early, and pay attention to how they answer rather than just what the number is. I am a real estate professional, not an attorney, and I am not licensed in Idaho, so confirm the specific forms and agency rules with a Boise agent. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles, the South Bay and on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, so I am not your Boise agent. If you would like an introduction to a few strong ones there so you can actually run the comparison I described, message me and I will make it. Zoltan


