Allowed, unfortunately, in most cases - and the reason is the same reason it keeps happening. A verbal agreement about real property generally isn't enforceable, and commercial purchase agreements almost always contain an integration clause saying the written contract is the complete agreement and supersedes anything discussed beforehand. So the promise made before escrow usually has no contractual force once the document is signed without it. That's the bad news. Here's the part that matters more. Your leverage isn't the promise. It's the due diligence period. In a commercial transaction, that period exists precisely for this: you investigate, you find problems, and you decide whether to proceed, renegotiate, or terminate. If your due diligence window is still open, you hold real power right now - usually the right to walk and recover your deposit, which is exactly the leverage that makes a seller reconsider zero credits. So the first question isn't whether the promise was binding. It's: where are you in the due diligence period, and what does your contract say you can do while it's open? Read that section today. How I'd use it. Put the findings in writing, with the inspection reports and, where it matters, contractor estimates attached - real problems becomes much more persuasive as documented scope and cost from a third party than as a characterization. Make a specific written request - a price reduction, a credit, or repairs completed before closing with proof - rather than reopening the original conversation, because sellers reject vague asks reflexively. State your position on proceeding plainly and without theatrics; if you'd terminate rather than close without an adjustment, say so once, factually, inside the window. And consider that a price reduction is often easier for a seller to accept than a credit, since credits can affect their lender's view of the deal and sometimes the appraisal. Same economics, less friction. If the due diligence period has already closed, your position is considerably weaker, and that's worth knowing honestly. You'd be looking at whatever the contract's remaining contingencies allow, and at a lawyer's read on whether anything rises to misrepresentation - which is a high bar and depends on what was disclosed rather than what was promised. The lesson for the rest of this deal, and every one after it: nothing counts until it's in the contract or a signed amendment. If you reach a new agreement now, get it executed as an amendment before you release a single contingency. In commercial transactions the handshake genuinely does not survive the paperwork, and people learn that exactly once. I'm a real estate broker, not an attorney, and I'm licensed in Alabama rather than Georgia. On a commercial deal with money at stake, have a Georgia commercial real estate attorney read your contract and your due diligence dates this week - that's a normal cost of a commercial transaction, not an escalation. Dustin Woodley, Camelot Properties, LLC - serving Montgomery, Prattville, Millbrook, Wetumpka, Pike Road, Auburn, Opelika, Lake Martin and the Tri County River Region area.


