Brian, you are right that the seller gets the same money at closing either way. The down payment does not change the price. What it changes is the probability that closing happens at all, and that is the only thing a seller is really buying when they pick between offers. Three specific mechanics. The appraisal cushion, which is the big one. Say the price is 500,000. A buyer putting 5 percent down needs a loan of 475,000, so the appraisal has to support essentially the whole price. If it comes in at 480,000, the deal is in trouble immediately. A buyer putting 30 percent down needs a loan of 350,000. That appraisal could come in at 380,000 and the lender still funds, because the loan-to-value still works. Same house, same day, same appraiser. One deal dies and the other does not notice. Sellers who have been through a low appraisal never forget it. Underwriting risk. A larger down payment usually means lower loan-to-value, which means fewer approval conditions, sometimes no mortgage insurance, and a file that is less sensitive to a last-minute change in the buyer's credit or income. Low-down-payment loans are not bad loans, but they generally sit closer to the edge of every guideline, so there is less room when something unexpected turns up two weeks before closing. Signal about the buyer generally. Someone with 30 percent liquid usually also has reserves left after closing. That matters when the inspection turns up a 6,000 dollar repair. A buyer with money behind them absorbs it. A buyer who scraped together the minimum has to ask you to pay for it, or walks. Now the part that answers your skepticism directly, because you are onto something real. The down payment is a proxy, not a cause. It is a rough signal a seller uses because they cannot see the buyer's actual file. And it is a signal that can be completely wrong. A buyer with 40 percent down and a shaky, unverified pre-approval from a lender nobody can reach is riskier than a buyer with 5 percent down who is fully underwritten with income and assets already documented. I would take the second one every time, and any experienced listing agent would too. Which is why the things that actually reduce a seller's risk are these, and they matter more than the percentage: A fully underwritten pre-approval, not a pre-qualification. Two very different documents. One means an underwriter has reviewed the actual file. The other means someone typed numbers into a calculator. A larger earnest money deposit, which is the buyer's real money at risk. That is the strongest single signal of commitment on the page and it is one nobody above mentioned. A lender who answers the phone and has a track record of closing on time. Shorter contingency periods. And in a tight appraisal situation, a written appraisal gap term, meaning the buyer agrees to cover a shortfall up to a stated dollar amount in cash. So if you are the buyer here and you do not want to put more down, you can compete on those instead. Get fully underwritten, use a lender with a local reputation, tighten your timelines, and put up serious earnest money. That package beats a bigger down payment from a stranger with a weak letter. If you are the seller, do not sort offers by down payment percentage. Have your agent call both lenders and ask what has actually been verified. Five minutes on the phone tells you more than the percentage does. I am a real estate professional, not a lender, so the underwriting specifics on any particular file should come from the loan officer on it. Deerfield is not my market, I am Zoltan Peresztegi, and I work Los Angeles and the South Bay. If you want a North Shore agent who will actually make those lender calls before advising you on which offer to take, I am glad to connect you with someone. Zoltan


