Hi there. The thread has the headline right, so let me give you the part that actually decides these cases. The test is not whether the water problem was fixed. The test is whether a reasonable buyer would want to know about it. A repaired water problem is still disclosable, and here is the thing sellers get backwards: the repair is what protects you, not silence about it. Start with the single most common seller misconception on this subject. Selling as is does not waive the disclosure duty in most states. As is generally means you will not make repairs. It does not mean you may conceal known defects. California makes waiver of the statutory disclosure void as a matter of public policy. Pennsylvania has no as-is exception to the duty to disclose known material defects. In Texas, checking the as-is box does not relieve a residential seller of the obligation to disclose known defects and adverse conditions. A few places are closer to buyer beware with narrower duties, Alabama being the clearest example and Virginia running on a similar principle while still requiring a disclosure statement. But if you are counting on as is to cover you, you are almost certainly wrong about your state. Second, the practical reason non-disclosure usually fails anyway. Water mitigation is visible. A sump pump, a French drain, an interior perimeter drain, epoxy injection in a foundation crack, efflorescence on block, a suspiciously new section of finished basement wall. A competent inspector notices all of it, and the buyer's next question is why. At that moment you have converted a manageable disclosure into something that looks like concealment, and the deal usually dies over the appearance rather than the water. So here is the reframe that actually helps sellers comply, and it is the part most people miss. Do not disclose the problem alone. Disclose the problem, the fix, and the documentation together. Name what happened and when, and what was done and who did it. Attach the contractor invoice, the permit if the work was permitted, any transferable warranty, and the date the work was completed. Then state plainly how many seasons have passed with a dry basement since. A bare line on a seller property disclosure that says "water issue" with no context is genuinely frightening to a buyer, because their imagination fills the gap with something worse than the truth. A documented repair with a paper trail reads as a solved problem and a careful owner. Same underlying fact, completely different buyer reaction. Now the risk side, honestly stated. Failing to disclose a known material defect can support a fraud or misrepresentation claim after closing, and those claims survive the closing table. Yes, a statute of limitations exists, but it varies by state and by the type of claim, and quietly betting that the clock runs out before a buyer notices a wet wall is not a plan, it is a wager with your equity. Two closing notes. Disclosure forms and duties are state specific, and the forms get revised over time, so the current version of your state's form is the authority here, not any general rule from an internet answer including mine. And I am a real estate professional, not an attorney. On anything involving a known defect with real dollars attached, spend an hour with a real estate attorney in your state. It is the cheapest part of the transaction. I work with buyers and sellers across Los Angeles, the South Bay and the Palos Verdes Peninsula, where our water issues tend to be slope drainage and hillside runoff rather than basements, and the disclosure principle is identical. You did not say where you are, so if you are outside my area I am glad to introduce you to a strong agent from my network. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi, and my advice is simple: disclose it, document it, and go first. Zoltan


