Good question, and I will answer it more directly than agents usually do. The thread is right that your agent owes you confidentiality once you are their client. Your motivation, your timeline, your absolute lowest number: an agent representing you should not be handing those to a buyer. That is a real duty, not a courtesy. But there is a distinction the thread skips, and it is the one that matters. Facts about the property are not confidential. Anything you tell your agent about a defect, a past leak, foundation movement, a repair that did not hold, an insurance claim, is generally a material fact, and in most states it has to be disclosed to buyers. Your agent cannot sit on it, and you should not want them to. That is not your agent betraying a confidence, that is disclosure law, and it protects you from a lawsuit after closing far more than it costs you in negotiation. Facts about your circumstances are confidential. That you are getting divorced, that you already bought another house, that you need to be out by September, that you would take twenty thousand less if pushed. That category is protected. So the honest rule is: tell your agent everything about the property, and be thoughtful about what you volunteer about yourself. Not because they will misuse it, but because information travels. It gets mentioned casually agent to agent, or in front of the wrong person at a showing. Now the exception nobody mentioned, and it is the important one. If your agent ends up representing the buyer as well, that is dual agency, and the duties change. In that situation an agent's obligations to each side are limited, and things you assumed were confidential may not be protected in the way you expected. Some states prohibit dual agency outright. Others allow it with written informed consent. Some brokerages use designated agency, where two agents from the same office take opposite sides. So ask your agent, before you sign anything: what happens if a buyer you are also working with wants my house? What does that do to what I have told you? A good agent has a clear answer. And ask them to walk you through the agency disclosure form rather than just handing it to you to sign, because that document is exactly where this is spelled out. Two more practical notes. Be careful what you say before you are formally a client. At a listing presentation you are interviewing, not yet represented. The protections attach to the relationship, so the conversation where you tell three agents your real bottom line is the least protected conversation of the whole process. And confidentiality generally survives the end of the relationship, so what you tell your agent does not become fair game after closing. What I would actually tell my agent, fully and early, if I were you: the property's history, warts included; your real timeline; your true financial constraints, meaning what you must net to make this work. That last one sounds like the thing to hide, but a good listing agent cannot build a strategy without it. If they do not know you need to clear a specific number, they cannot tell you whether your price is realistic or whether you should wait. The thing I would keep to myself is emotional urgency. Not the facts, the desperation. There is a difference between "we need to close by September for a job start" and "we are panicking." The first is useful information for your agent. The second changes how people treat you. I am a real estate professional, not an attorney, and agency rules vary by state, so have your agent explain how Missouri handles this specifically. My name is Zoltan Peresztegi and I work in Los Angeles, the South Bay and on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, so I am not your Springfield agent. If you want an introduction to a strong listing agent in southwest Missouri who will answer the dual agency question straight rather than getting defensive about it, message me and I will make one. How they answer that question tells you most of what you need to know about them. Zoltan


