If you genuinely expect to own the condo for only five or six years, an ARM can be worth considering—but I wouldn't choose it simply because the initial rate is lower. The key question is what happens if your timeline doesn't go according to plan. A 30-year fixed mortgage gives you a predictable principal and interest payment for the entire loan term. With an ARM, the rate is fixed for an initial period and then can adjust according to the loan's terms. After the initial period, your rate—and potentially your monthly payment—could increase if market rates are higher. That's the biggest risk with your situation. You may plan to sell in five years, but the market may not cooperate. If the condo doesn't sell when you expect, prices decline, or you can't refinance because of your financial situation or the property's value, you could end up owning the property after the ARM begins adjusting. I'd ask your lender for the fully indexed rate, adjustment frequency, caps, floor, margin, and maximum possible payment. Then compare the ARM against a 30-year fixed based on the number of years you realistically expect to own the property—not just the initial monthly payment. Also consider the condo itself. HOA fees, special assessments, insurance, and resale demand can have a significant impact on your overall cost and your ability to sell when you're ready. An ARM isn't necessarily a bad choice for a starter home. It can make sense for the right borrower with a realistic short-to-medium-term ownership plan. But I would make sure you can comfortably afford the payment even if the rate adjusts upward, rather than relying entirely on being able to sell or refinance before that happens. Juan Picos Real Estate Agent JohnHart Real Estate


